I know, I
know! It’s been a long, long time
again. But in my defense I have been
working on three projects at once, including finishing off the latest book. The latter has been presenting a few problems
regarding the ending. It has now been
proofread (Orage – you have done a marvelous job; many thanks!) and all
corrections… well… corrected, I suppose. But the ending… the bloody
ending! Quite rightly, its plausibility
has been questioned; but then again the entire tale is not particularly
credible, having started life as a simple re-write of a piece I once read back
in the 80s (the first spanking-orientated novel I ever purchased) redirected,
expanded and extended to better fulfil my tastes. From that starting point though – and mindful
of such pseudo-factual works by Richard Manton / R.T. Mason as ‘Whips Incorporated’ (about an1880s
‘chastising service’, Janus Magazine Issue 38, 1985, Gatisle Ltd) – it slowly
developed a certain aspect of the supernatural, the premise being that the
action takes place in early 60s Paddington (London) and within one of the two
houses previously occupied by that self-same ‘chastising service’ from the late
1800s into the Edwardian era and along with certain specialized ‘original
features’ something of the ‘atmosphere’ of the place has survived .
But it is the
ending where it all goes awry. What the
problem comes down to, at that point, is the impression it gives of the number
of people involved. Too many people
involved smacks too much of some kind of wide-spread conspiracy – and such
things are unlikely to go by unnoticed.
It is the same problem I have with those James Bond-type movies in which
some implausibly-rich despot apparently has half a small nation in his pay as
his work force / private army; and not a whisper leaks out, despite the fact
that he is quietly hollowing out the local volcano (as one does) and presumably
tying up every JCB in whichever hemisphere he has chosen to set up his bid for
world domination. Not that are actually
very many characters involved in my particular ‘conspiracy’ at all; it’s just
that it is all too easy for the reader to form that impression in the last few
pages, and the risk then is that the illusion is shattered.
It is
particularly embarrassing in light of the fact that I was recently asked to
write a piece for the spanking ezine, the Wellred Weekly (the electronic
journal of the Library of Spanking Fiction (link in the right hand sidebar,
under Useful Resources’. And of course I
chose to pontificate on the subject of ‘plausibility’ in spanking story writing… It is so embarrassing that I am even
considering publishing the thing under a different name! My proof-reader has suggested a way out,
which I’m considering (thanks yet again, Orage) but until then it’s all up in
the air a bit.
Mind you, I
still have the cover to do, and I will want to try to recreate a street scene
from the early 1960s, which wont be easy.
I have already been to the Paddington area - even to the address given
in ‘Whips Incorporated’ (the house has gone – if it ever really existed) - and
have taken a few shots of the right type of house and a couple of terraces of
houses from the correct era or earlier.
Talking of
travelling: Around three weeks ago I was privileged to meet the guy who has
supplied many of the 3D computer renderings I have featured on this blog in the
past, Snoozz! I’m pushed for time today
so I’ll tell you more next time – suffice it to say that many beers were
imbibed (at least in my case – ha, ha!
But what can I say: I get nervous!).
Also on my travels (Muswell Hill, North
London ) I came across a magazine cover in
a box of odds and sods outside a tiny antiques / bric-a-brac shop (I spent an
entire 25p on it!). Dated 1929, I had to rescue it
from the rain, but what really caught my eye was the advert (top, left). Very much of its time, it gives an insight
into a era when a fine display of maids’ uniforms and domestic service apparel
in a high street shop window was not an open invitation to fits of giggles,
embarrassed half-glances or the knowing wink of an eye. It’s a sensibility I can imagine returning as
the economic system worsens, labour becomes cheaper, the chances of a young
woman or school leaver gaining a roof over her head plummets and the gap
between rich and poor widens. When the
hunger begins to gnaw, the icy spiked rains of the British winter begin to cut
through to the bone and the shop doorways look less and less hospitable; that’s
when the prospect of a live-in position will seem most attractive, whatever her
prospective employer’s restrictions, stipulations and – yes, perhaps even the
veiled mention of corporal punishment.
The keen-eyed
among you may well recognize that company name, E & R Garrould, from what I
have said in the past regarding that point in my life when I was for a few
glorious, golden years (along with my wife of the time) involved in a
‘lifestyle’ relationship with a pretty-ish, if naïve young thing who my wife
had taken under her wing following the girl’s dismissal from her live-in
position as children’s nanny. Having
literally come straight from having left school, and not particularly
intelligent nor known for her initiative, personally I still to this day think
it incredible that she had been employed in such a role in the first place –
but I guess that’s another story.
As regards that
company: A professional nursing magazine
dated Dec 19098 stated “Nurses who are accustomed to [purchasing] their uniforms
and nursing requisites at Messrs. Garrould's, 150, Edgware Road, W1, will find
at the present time that the spacious Nursing Saloon is transformed into a
Christmas Bazaar.” Well, I’m not sure
about any ‘spacious Nursing Saloon’ but I do know from my earliest
recollections of passing Messrs. Garrould's premises that up to at least the late 70s, if not the
early 80s, it existed as a double fronted shop with large display windows
either side of the glass-door entrance hall.
By the mid to late 1980s when my wife of the time and I marched our
live-in plaything up the Edgware Road the shop had dwindled to shadow of its
former self , consisting only of the smaller of its original two display
windows and the associated floor space beyond.
Although the door was in the same place, the entrance hall was now
shared with the doorway leading into another shop entirely. It was later to disappear completely, leaving
only the Alexandra Workwear outlets for our further forays with the hapless
Penny (and they too evaporated as the
90s wore on, having expanded rapidly through the 80s).
I think the
problem with E & R Garroulds was that stylistically their various uniforms
- and especially their domestic service apparel – hadn't moved on; indeed there
had been little change in many of their styles since the 70s, with some
examples clearly dating back even earlier than that. But that was exactly what had caught our
collective eye – my ‘other half’ and I.
And yes, back in late 1987 we were still able to purchase for our charge
the traditional black dress, a selection of broderie anglaise tea aprons, a cap
and an Edwardian-style bib-apron which had a flounced trim running around its
square-necked bib that was so broad it formed cap sleeves over the shoulders
and which looked like the Tenniel illustrations of Alice in Wonderland. All well and good for serving at table and
for special occasions, but when it came to more everyday work around the home
and general domestic duties (most of the time for our dear Penny) it was down
to the Marble Arch and in to their more modern competitors, the aforementioned Alexandra
Workwear, where a very fetching outfit was available, a button-through dress in
some highly practical man-made fabric, lilac, the lower half a solid block of
colour, the bodice striped lilac and white.
A striped lilac and white waist apron and striped cap completed the
picture. With the latter accessories put
aside and a lilac button-through cardigan (purchases later elsewhere) worn over
the top, we judged the dress perfectly wearable in the street or when out
shopping; something which could not be said for any of the Garroulds offerings
at the time, to be honest.
The other pics
just show the advertisement in context and the magazine cover, the latter
largely so as to ensure its conservation, even if only as an image. So many prints, books and periodicals are
disappearing as they are sliced up and their various picture plates and
illustrations framed for sale in antiques and collectables emporia. Actually it took a fair amount of fiddling
around, as the page is larger than A4 and couldn't be fitted on my scanner,
necessitating I scan it piecemeal and then piece it together afterwards on the
computer.